User talk:MicroGlyphics

1. I edited the phrase: collective unconscious, also called "the archetypes" because archetypes are constituents of collective unconscious rather than analogous.

2. The page ends with this statement: Is the unconscious altogether inaccessible, or is it just hard to access?

I am not sure this is a controversial topic. Yes, unconscious and conscious ideas flow between their realms, but once an idea has passed from, say, unconscious to conscious by way of a dream and is noted, it is no longer unconscious, but rather it is conscious. N'est pas? Also, in the Freudian model, the unconscious consists of previously conscious (and subliminal) thoughts, but once they are relegated to the realm of the unconscious, they cannot be retrieved at will. The are for all intens and purposes inaccessible.

3. I believe the title of this page should simply unconscious rather than unconscious mind. The inclusion of mind is superfluous.

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello MicroGlyphics! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Amrit Kaur Willis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 12:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amrit Kaur Willis

The article Amrit Kaur Willis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO, unable to find significant coverage in third-party reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hut 8.5 08:37, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]