User talk:Clarknova

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Thank you.

Useful links

General style, tags, and templates

The Three Sisters

Wikipedia has 3 overarching policies that any contributor should read

Misc

All New: 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Orphaned: 500 1001 1501

My name

I would be more surprised if you had found my name in a dictionary. It's my own invention. Its intended meaning is the study of bits and pieces of everything from a wide variety of sources. This has been consistent with the broad dabbling that I have done over the last couple years in the Wikimedia projects. Eclecticology 17:05, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Edit summary field

Hi! Just some advise from a co-wikipedian with common interests: it would be super-nice if everybody took a couple of seconds to fill in the summary field after editing articles (e.g. fixing typos -- in fact, especially then), so all the watchlist users didn't have to check the diff to find out what has changed. Saves us all a little annoyance and some time. No need for a doctoral thesis in the summary, just some short abbrevs will do, like "typo" etc. --Wernher 15:42, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)

After about twenty minor edits in a row I just get tired of lableing every one, but you've got a point. I'll be more disciplined about it. — Clarknova 20:46, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Squirrel picture

Hi Clarkanova... that's a very nice photo you've put on the Pine Squirrel page, but what species do you think it is? It looks much more like an Eastern Gray Squirrel than either of the pine squirrels to me, but I don't know T. hudsonicus well. seglea 21:11, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

You, my friend, are right! — Clarknova 21:45, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Timewave Zero, &c.

Hi there. I'm officially wanting to ask you about the Timewave Zero screenshot you created. Did you make it? If so, do you know how to get the software? I've been looking everywhere but I can't find it. (Unofficially, I have the courage to ask you this because your user page makes you seem quite interesting. [end compliment])

Heh. Thanks. And yes, I have a copy, but unfortunately it's an earlier version, not the "Final" which allowed you to plot several waves, including the one based on John Sheliak's correction. I downloaded that one in 1998, but lost it when a machine of mine crashed. It's no longer being offered by anyone, which is a shame. It represented a lot of work by some very smart people.

I offer you three options. I can:

send you the standard email with TWZ attached,
give you my address, to which you'll mail five bucks for media and shipping (I make no profit), and then I'll send you my 3 CD set of McKenna lectures, interviews, and the TWZ software, or
do both.

Send an email to somanova at spiritelf dot com and tell me which you'd prefer. (This offer is open to anyone reading this page.) — Clarknova 18:06, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Added a permanent link to the TWZ software (in the form of a zip archive) to the Novelty Theory page. — Clarknova 04:33, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Voynich Manuscript

You are right about the title of Levitov's book, sorry. Thanks for fixing that.
Jorge Stolfi 02:55, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thanks

It's because I'm supposed to be working. Meelar (talk) 05:35, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

Riddle on my page

Thanks for the additional riddle. Sorry for the long time until my thanks, but I don't visit my page that often. I was wondering if you could explain how a placenta leads armies. I'm just not making the connection. Thanks again. Remuel 14:44, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

In ancient Egypt the Pharaoh's placenta was preserved, mounted on a pole, and borne before the army into battle. This was the first flag. They retain this symbolism in the unconscious, as can be seen in phrases like "mother country", "birth of a nation", etc. — Clarknova 19:19, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks.Remuel 16:34, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:220s.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:220s.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Your Advice

Thank you for the tips, I'll see what I can do, but I think I want to go through that moderation before I mess with trying to put up the heavily cited material, just so I don't get that immediately reverted back as well.

PS, I have to ask.... are you the Clarknova from #sputnik?

KV 06:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hermetism

Hermetism has also been rewritten substantially, I intend to fuse in some of the Hermeticism information that is also applicable to it...... and then perhap break off the relationship to other systems section into it's own article.

KV 07:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stuffed tomatoes

Stuffed tomatoes has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe (Talk) 02:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

aya stuff

I actually spent about two months living down there last summer, before heading over to peru to attend the first annual conference on amazonian shamanism (hosted by alan shoemaker and Soga del Alma). It was quite an experience, to say the least. I was living with a family of shamans, casimiro is about 75 and began his apprenticeship when he was still a kid, maybe 8 or 9. His wife, two of their sons, a daughter-in-law and a granddaughter also live there. There isn't really much aya tourism yet in ecuador, which is nice, and Casimiro is from the old school- none of the mestizo stuff you'd find in peru, his icaros are all from the jungle . . .

Honestly for such an intense two months (or perhaps because of that) i have trouble saying much about it . . .

None of the ayahuasca experiences were all that intense, compared to other experiences i've had and the experiences of others there. But that's basicly due to the stuff i was struggling with and working through at the time, i guess. I still learned a hell of a lot . . .

I don't have a blog or online journal or anything of that sort, but i am a member of the ayahuasca forum and have talked about some of it there. I do have about 5 more rolls of film that i haven't gotten developed for some reason, i'd like to do that and scan some more stuff in. dunno if i have any photos of finished tea, when it's done they kinda hide it until ceremony time.

I'd write a bit more but i have to drive down to school. If you've got any questions or anything or want some contact info just say the word . . . They're always happy to have visitors.

cheers

--He:ah? 22:59, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject.......

Wikiproject: Egyptian Religion

KV 19:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

manly hall

put back the neutrality tags, and clean up tags, on the manly hall article, or correct them yourself, not really nice to push your occultish agenda down other people's throat's now is it? 195.134.69.158 15:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi clarkenova

thought you might be interested in the following.... no worries if your not too bothered.........the playground continues nevertheless.......Thesource42 17:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

childish redirect

(the article presently on the main Clairsentience page .. if it stays there for 5 minutes ... is the old first draft before months of work was childishly trashed and a meaningless redirect to the clairvoyance page put in its place...Thesource42 17:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the playground games continue...

ive posted this on the clairvoyance talk page after someone completely removed the clar#irsentience article which had gone through a process of months of work , rewrites , endless discussion , removasl of personal matereal , edits for style and content .... endless work on correct sourcing and wikpedia referencing and formatting..... the article which had been arrived at with co operation and discussion over many weeks and v man who himself put some hours into grammer , punctuation ... re editting for stlye and content ... and much help in correct sourcing and referencing .....Thesource42 17:15, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this article was the sum of many peoples input , effort and hard work so i dont know how or who removed it so thoughtlessly and put the meaningless redirect to the clairvoyance page... any help would be great.... cheers..Thesource42 17:15, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi guys

i see youve redirected the clairsentience article.... let me ask....what was the point of the weeks of discussions and rewrites if you guys were going to redirect it anyway....you should have told me t get lost out of here...... what was the point of it all? why did i listen to you ? at all? why did i remove all personal references? why did i reference and source all of my matereal diligently and in great detail ? why did i edit and re edit for style and content ? why did i make additional references to religios , anthropological ,socialogical , philosophical ,medical , physics , chemistry , botany , mental health etc so that all views were included and respected? why did i fulfill all of the above hurdles and hoops to fulfill wikpedia formatting and guidlines for you too to delete months of hard work and effort. your actions are without integrity or honour .....

clairsentience article redirect ?

Hi ..... whoever removed the clairsentience article and made it redirect ... can you please try and respect that the article that was there had evolved over a couple of months of discussion and many rewrites and multiple edits which involved much discussion over a long period...... .........i could delete this clairvoyance article.... but i wont because revert and delete wars then stupidly take place which is a real shame when a library becomes a bar room brawl......

..... i hope you can respect the clairsentience article...

..... ive been clairsentient for most of my adult life and it wasnt easy to come this far and to struggle for decades to articulate my experience in a way which makes rational sense to the world at large of which the clairsentience article is a manifest example..... so please try and respect the vast amount of struggle and work which has gone into it....

File:Gfi.socket.png

Now that's an interesting image... was that a manipulation of a photograph, or did you draw that freehand? 68.39.174.238 20:55, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Etisalat vandals

Those instances of vandalism were many days ago. We don't usually block vandals unless they have been vandalizing in the last couple of hours, and after a level 4 warning. — coel acan — 18:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Procyon-v-sol.MOST.png

Hello Clarknova, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Procyon-v-sol.MOST.png) was found at the following location: User:Clarknova/links. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Magic_johnson_book_cover.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Magic_johnson_book_cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 03:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Procyon-v-sol.MOST.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Procyon-v-sol.MOST.png. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 01:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Munditia

You’re right: it’s not the same reliquary. That wasn’t immediately obvious to me when I was creating the article. I removed the second image from the article. I found the (correct) image quite by accident, I forget how, saw that there was no article for Munditia, and started writing the article. There’s not much info about Munditia out there, at least not thus far. Thanks! Best regards. --Polylerus 16:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wilhelm and the McKenna conspiracy

Wow, I'm shocked to E-meet some one else who will consider the ideas of Wilhelm Reich anything but hogwash. We clearly have some common points of view and nothing to lose by sharing them. Might I ask you to drop me an E-mail if time permits? That way we can type like civilized people away from these vulgar public message boards. I'm at DBrown29@mix.wvu.edu and I hope to hear from you. Adiuex.71.61.220.31 (talk) 23:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology

SMART is a system used to kill the drive when the warranty is up —Clarknova 03:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

From what I read of your page, you came across as someone with intelligence... Obviously not if you write such rubbish as the line above. 86.136.139.202 (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Novelty theory

I have nominated Novelty theory, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novelty theory (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 00:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This marks the second time an attempt to delete the article has failed. At least this time the article creator was warned :) —Clarknova (talk) 01:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move of Novelty theory to Timewave zero

As the creator of the article, you may wish to comment here. Cardamon (talk) 00:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image for nomination

I replied on my talk page. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 08:48, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Snells law wavefronts

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Snells_law_wavefronts.gif, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Wronkiew (talk) 06:52, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted image

I deleted File:Brzezinski-BinLaden.jpg as the image had no source given and no fair use rationale, as well raising all sorts of WP:BLP issues. I deleted it under Wikipedia:CSD#F6 (and other speedy deletion criteria almost certainly apply). Unless and until a valid source can be provided, please do not upload it again. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cute

Re: There is also an endless supply of mineral water...

Check. Undone. Was this a test of some kind? --ShelfSkewed Talk 04:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know the only two edits I've ever made to that article were disambiguating the Golden Dawn link and now removing the mineral water comment. Otherwise my only serious entanglement with Rosicrucianism was by way of reading Foucault's Pendulum. No, I'm as much in the dark as you. --ShelfSkewed Talk 04:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I enjoyed our correspondence anyway. Happy editing! --ShelfSkewed Talk 05:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Timewave_zero#Redirect proposal

Notice: You commented in an Article for deletion for Timewave zero , an RFC has been opened on whether this article should be replaced with a Redirect. Please comment on the above link. Lumos3 (talk) 15:46, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Clark,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Snells law wavefronts.gif is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 22, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-09-22. howcheng {chat} 04:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Medium is the Massage

A tag has been placed on The Medium is the Massage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. fetch comms 20:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Clarknova! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Edén Pastora - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:55, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Test;About

Hello Clarknova,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Test;About for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ~Helicopter Llama~ 00:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Test:About

Hello Clarknova,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Test:About for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ~Helicopter Llama~ 00:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Clarknova. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Clarknova. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Limbo (Marvel Comics)

The article Limbo (Marvel Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 11:52, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]