Jump to content

Talk:Tutankhamun

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTutankhamun has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 9, 2019Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 26, 2004, November 26, 2005, November 26, 2006, February 16, 2011, February 16, 2013, February 16, 2017, February 16, 2019, and February 16, 2022.

[edit]

MersmanD (talk) 22:05, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to File:CairoEgMuseumTaaMaskMostlyPhotographed.jpg? That image has been on Common for eight years and was uploaded as the submitter's own work, so I'm somewhat dubious that it's a copyright violation. What's your evidence for the claim? A. Parrot (talk) 01:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because it is in the public domain it may have just been copied off of wikipedia and put on other websites. Sorry for the mis-interpretation. But I did find it on multiple websites using Google Image Search. It again could just be a mirror website. MersmanD (talk) 11:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also please look at this CopyVios link https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Tutankhamun&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 MersmanD (talk) 11:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't a productive way to find copyvios. We encourage use of Commons images by other sites. If you really have a problem with a Commons image, raise it on Commons first. Johnbod (talk) 12:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
MersmanD, I know your account is new and you probably don't have a lot of experience with how Wikipedia works. But Wikipedia is mirrored so widely across the internet that if you used evidence this slender as your standard for copyright-tagging, you'd end up tagging most of Wikipedia. The copyvio tool link you provided shows a list of page with text that overlaps with that in this article... and the page with the strongest overlap is a forum page with a post that is explicitly quoting from Wikipedia. Copyright violation is an extremely important thing to watch out for. But if you go looking for it, please do some basic due diligence to distinguish when Wikipedia is copying from other people, as opposed to other people copying from Wikipedia. A. Parrot (talk) 16:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the lineage

[edit]

I have done my own work and found the Tut was son of KV55, who is either of two possibilities: if the skull is old, it is likely that of Akhenaten, however there are Forensic examiners who independently claim the skull is young and if so would therefore be Smenkhkare, youngest son of Queen Tiye, the mother of KV35YL. Secondly: If Kiya's image was replaced in the Amarna Sunshade with that of Merytaten, they were equals where KV35YL must then be Kiya as all possible attending attributes coincide. - Robert Cole 2600:6C8A:7000:35:315E:C619:218D:500E (talk) 19:17, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]