User talk:CoastTOcoast533

Andrew Adams (modern)

Are you Andrew? If so, you should put all of this material on your User page, not in an encyclopedia article. 172.166.101.23 21:54, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Spam protection

On my used page, spam protection is blocking a web adress with numbers. I can't even type it here or it will block it. That isn't spam, it's a web adress. Do you know what I can do about that? --CoastTOcoast533 03:26, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I don't know. it sounds like it's something particular to the spam protection program running on your computer, rather than anything to do with Wikipedia. -- Arwel 13:11, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Music

Great music collection! - Gsgeorge 23:10, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thank you! - CoastTOcoast533 14:19, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

My gosh, that was today a year ago... --CoastTOcoast533 02:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah great music collection. I can just see you walking into Hot Topic wearing your linkin park shirt... Very "indie rock." HA

I don't listen to them anymore. It's my full collection, I'm not going to take it out because I don't like them anymore. --CoastTOcoast533 18:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Classic Rock

Hello. I was wondering if you would like to participate in my classic rock survey. I'm trying to find the most like classic rock song. There is more information on my user page. Hope you participate! RENTASTRAWBERRY ^{FOR LET?} röck 00:52, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Userpage

Thanks for the input, CoastToCoast, but it's my userpage, and I will handle it as I want. You will notice that the heading of that section is "articles to which I have contributed," and adding a link to MySpace certainly is a "contribution," at least in a technical sense. You will also note the disclaimer at the bottom which reads "Note: many edits are rather minor." Anyway, I don't really view the list as a means of self-glorification, saying "WOW, LOOK at all of the great work I have done on Wikipedia." Rather, the list is just an interesting way for viewers of my userpage to get some idea of what articles I have randomly come across and had sufficient interest in to make SOME type of edit on. I've even thought about explicitly stating as much, but decided that most of my fellow Wikipedians would realize that it is not their place to comment on how I decide to arrange my userpage - nor is it of any real significance to Wikipedia or the Wikipedia community. I do not understand why you are concerned enough about this issue to leave a message on my talk page. I am a beginning Wikipedian (member for two weeks). I make no claims of greatness. I am just here to have fun and make what contributions I can.

I don't think that making a posting like the one you did on my talk page contributes constructively to Wikipedia or anything else. If anything, your post runs contrary to the ideals of the Wikipedia community. I refer you to this page for a discussion of the appropriate way to treat two-week old Wikipedians.

Also, please see the PaloAlto talk page for a discussion of the MySpace link removal. Talk:Paloalto Dave Runger 22:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Favorite Songs

My survey has changed. I am now continuing my mission for the best songs, but now I am accepting all genres. I'm giving you a chance to revote for your top ten favorite songs of any genres (not just classic rock which is still the best). I've made a executive decision to keep the existing survey results and just add on to that with the new entries. My feeling for doing this is because classic rock is the most influential genre in music currently so it should be expressed more in the survey. Thank you for contributing in the past, and hopefully in the future. ROCK ON. RENTASTRAWBERRY ^{FOR LET?} röck 03:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Daphne_Loves_Derby_-_Post_Post_EP.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Daphne_Loves_Derby_-_Post_Post_EP.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bigr Tex 17:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Daphne Loves Derby - Acoustic EP.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Daphne Loves Derby - Acoustic EP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Imsorryimleavingcover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Imsorryimleavingcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pcep2.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pcep2.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dld.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dld.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Daphne Loves Derby - Acoustic EP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Daphne Loves Derby - Acoustic EP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Ferdinand

I noticed you've put in a lot of good work maintaining the state of the Franz Ferdinand (band) page. You may be interested in a dispute about the Franz Ferdinand page. It used to point to the disambiguation page - as, despite there being more searches for the band than the archduke, users will be interested in both topics. Unfortunately, it has recently been changing to point directly to the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria page. Could you read the discussion on the Talk:Franz Ferdinand page? I think your input would be of value. Thanks, Wardroad (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Come Now Sleep/Come Now, Sleep

I don't have an opinion one way or t'other about whether or not there's a comma in the title. I do know, however, that you can't just take a page with a history and turn it into a redirect to a page you've only just started. What you have to do is move the page to the new title. Now, since you've done it the wrong way already and made things more complicated, I'll help you out here:

Go to Come Now Sleep (which currently redirects to the original article) and paste {{db-move|Come Now, Sleep}} at the top of the page.
Once that page is deleted by an admin, go to Come Now, Sleep and click the "move" tab at the top of the page and move the original (the one with the comma) article to your preferred version (sans comma).
Note: The admin who deletes Come Now Sleep may also take care of the move for you. In my experience they probably won't, but it's not uncommon.
?
Profit

Please only move pages when you're absolutely sure in your heart of hearts. TheJazzDalek (talk) 02:59, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello CoastTOcoast533! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 10 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Joel Bernstein - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Joel Bernstein

I have nominated Joel Bernstein, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Bernstein. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daphne Loves Derby (album)

Hello, CoastTOcoast533, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Daphne Loves Derby (album), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Mattg82 (talk) 18:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CoastTOcoast533. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CoastTOcoast533. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CoastTOcoast533. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CoastTOcoast533. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Acoustic EP (Daphne Loves Derby abum)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Acoustic EP (Daphne Loves Derby abum). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 2#Acoustic EP (Daphne Loves Derby abum) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 13:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]