User talk:Taestell/Archive 1

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 23:17, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)

Cincinnati bridges

I took some pics of the bridges around Cincy today and posted them to Commons. Find 'em here: commons:category:Cincinnati, Ohio.

Thanks a lot. --taestell 07:11, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

I got a better shot of the Taylor-Southgate the other day from across the river. --Tysto 04:51, 2005 August 14 (UTC)

List of albums

Thank you for adding to wikipedia however I must point out that EPs are not considered albums and should not be added to that list. Also some longtime editors like Tuf-KAT are pretty much strict on what can be added to the list and periodically delete entries that are not formatted and do not have info boxes. Megan1967 04:33, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I will go ahead and remove all of the EPs from the list. The articles themselves were just created, and hopefully will grow to eventually contain info boxes. taestell 19:42, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)

Systm pre-VFD

I saved the old Systm article, including the revision history, via Special:Export before it was deleted. I'm not sure how you saved it (if at all), but if you're interested I can send the file (xml) to you. —Mar ka ci 2005-06-22 T 17:54 Z

Mozilla Application Suite

Thanks man! I don't know why they pruned the revision history so that I can't revert to previous revision. Maybe because the one who did that is an admin? Anyway, thanks for fixing the article. --minghong 02:17, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

User:Tony Sidaway merged the article with Mozilla, eliminating its history. I understand that there was some sort of GNU FDL issue, but I still think it was a bad idea to undo all of the work everyone had put into that article. Oh well, it'll get fixed. --taestell 03:21, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

Revision 3

Looks like there's plenty of consensus without me. siafu 00:09, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I've added my Keep vote to the page. — Peter McGinley 08:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. --taestell 13:07, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

f2g.net

It seems that the server is down. I can't visit my website, can't login the FTP or web interface. Just to see if you encounter the same problem too. :-/ --minghong 16:20, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've experienced a lot of problems with f2g.net, especially general slowness. I just moved my main blog to a different free host, cjb.cc. It's very similar to f2g, except that they give more space and bandwidth, and allow some PHP and .htaccess. The guy running it hand-approves all of the applications, so it hopefully will not ever become as slow and unreliable as f2g. --taestell 23:59, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

It seems that the DoS attacks had finished. At least I can access my website now. :-) --minghong 12:55, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Baltic States

Hi, surely the Baltic States are commonly understood in English as Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia and the article Baltic States should primarily deal with that? The article as it is is 95% about them as it is, and this conception of 'Baltic Countries' while valid (e.g. http://www.cbss.st ?) is somewhat secondary to the existing meaning. Disclaimer: I have no specific knowledge on this, only snooping around because I'm off to Riga next week! -- Blorg 23:39, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an expert on the topic, and I merged the three or four articles on the subject per requests from other users. I organized the sections (Baltic Sea countries, Balticum, Baltic states) in the most logical way that I knew how. However, if you know more on the topic than I do, I'm sure the article would benefit greatly from your contributions and reorganization. Thanks, --taestell 05:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning EP

I noticed you changed it from a redirect to European Parliament to a disambiguation page. However, we are currently seeking consensus on what to do with EP on its talk page. Please read the talk page, and possibly add in your two cents. (You don't have to undo your changes though.) To give you a little background, it was originally a disambiguation page, but then I argued that it should redirect to extended play, to which a few people agreed (and no one disagreed). Then, someone changed it to redirect to European Parliament, and we have to start all over again. My arguments against it being a disambiguation page are on the EP talk page. —EdGl 23:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Shams3bw.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shams3bw.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Milford Parkway

I reverted your edit; please read WP:USSH. --NE2 20:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:MMW.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MMW.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:07, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chris(topher) Wood

Thank you for your good work here. I see that you're continuing to clear up the mess. When you get tired or too bored, don't push yourself but instead just stop: I have to disconnect myself from the net for a couple of hours now, but after that I'll continue the disambiguation. -- Hoary 00:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help on this. Unfortunately, I don't know a lot about the artists named Christopher Wood and it is hard to tell on some pages which one is being talked about.

For now, I'm just leaving several of them how they are; hopefully you or someone else knows more about them than I do. --taestell 01:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC) Done. (Aside from more or less automatically generated pages, archives, and a user page.) There's something slightly fishy about the Scots artist, however. This pair of edits was of course indefensible, but thought provoking all the same. -- Hoary[reply]

dab assistance

Thanks for the help with the William Wrigley dabs. I am wondering how I should dab the Category:Busch family. Many of them seem like they should have August Busch dab headers. However, it may be more appropriate for the whole family to have Busch dab headers. What do you think? TonyTheTiger 16:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Supremes albums

Category:The Supremes albums is a subset of Category:Motown albums (all Supremes LP releases were issued on Motown). Therefore, each Supremes album should not be included individually in the Motown albums category. --FuriousFreddy 03:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(no title)

Who told you can you edit anything on my page...this is the second time I had to confront someone today about this....STAY THE FUCK OFF MY USER PAGE!!!! --ShawnHill 18:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See User talk:ShawnHill#User page edit. --taestell 19:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I want to apologize for my outburst, the tone in which I came at you was out of line...you showed respect when you responed back, so, I must do so in kind. My frustrations wasn't totally directed towards per se, but towards the site in general, and some of our fellow Wikipedians and the way this site is used. I won't bore you with my feelings about the site, but I understand why you did what did, and again my apologies to you.ShawnHill 22:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Radio station moves

Hi Taestell. Could you point me towards the radio station naming conventions before I perform your requested move? Thanks. —Mets501 (talk) 02:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested page moves

The guidelines for tv/radio station article names are posted at Wikipedia:WikiProject Radio Stations#Redirects/disambiguation articles. Thanks, —taestell 02:28, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Mets501 (talk) 03:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Michael Smith

Just wondering what was wrong with the previous name for this article (Mike Smith (Gloucestershire cricketer)). It doesn't particularly matter since the redirect from the latter still exists, but given that he's always called Mike it seems strange to change the article title to a form of his name that I don't think I've ever seen used! Loganberry (Talk) 23:35, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LoPbN Cat

Checking for Cat'n of LoPbN pages by scanning their source is an erroneous procedure. Their renderings show the Cat that they "inherit" by design thru a template.
--Jerzy•t 20:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Shams3bw.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shams3bw.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 03:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crosby, Stills and Nash

Could you explain somebody would make edits like this? I might point a couple things out to you:

The link points to the same article before and after your edit.
You made no change which is visible to the reader, not even changing "and" to "&", as you may have intended, if indeed the ampersand is the more correct form.
Needlessly adding piped links on a large scale makes paragraph text more verbose and difficult for article editors to sift through.

Please consider leaving the harmless redirects alone. On the other hand, there are likely thousands of pages that link to misspelled redirects. "Fixing" these "wikified typoes" (by doing a full replacement of the bracketed text) would be of significantly greater benefit (you will probably find other spelling errors to fix while you're there, even) than changing a link that's not broken, and piping one that needs not be disambiguated. —freak(talk) 21:32, Nov. 9, 2006 (UTC)

TV/radio station moves

Hi! Just want to let you know that I think you've misinterpreted the naming conventions. Per WP:NAME:

All full-power Canadian FM and commercial TV stations have a (-FM or -TV) suffix... most U.S. and many Mexican stations, do not.

A quick search of the FCC FM Query for, say, WUSB shows that the correct call sign is simply "WUSB"; compare to the results for WCBS (which lists the station as "WCBS-FM").

Some parts of the guidelines refer to what to do if there are multiple stations with the same base callsign. It doesn't mean that all FM/TV stations should have titles with the "-FM"/"-TV" suffices, because many do not.

It's a common mistake, but the distinction is important. Happy editing! — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 22:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of idioms in the English language

List of idioms in the English language -

A sub-article component of this article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy .
Please share your thoughts on the matter at the sub-article's entry on the Articles for deletion page.
Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the guide to deletion.

Steps to list an article for deletion

I just thought you may wish to contribute to the debate. WLD 14:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFBOT

Your recent bot approvals request has been approved for trial. Please see the request page for details. -- RM 13:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The access to AWB is being approved per the bot's status at WP:BRFA, please note the restricted edit rate as stated in Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TaeBot, if the edit rate is faster than the allowed rate during the trial period it may get the bot blocked. --WinHunter ^(talk) 14:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Category:Date of birth missing

Good evening. Per the discussion about privacy concerns expressed at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of birthdays, date of birth should generally not be added to the biographies of living non-public or semi-public figures. So far, that policy has been interpreted fairly strictly with a pretty high bar being set for the definition of "public figures" who are assumed to have given up their rights to privacy.

By the same token, we should not be adding Category:Date of birth missing to articles unless we have made the case that the person meets the "public figures" threshold. Otherwise, we're just baiting new users into adding content even though the community has already said that we shouldn't include that particular data point. Category:Year of birth missing is okay but the exact date is often not. Thanks for your help. Rossami (talk) 06:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Double Redirect

Oops, it looks like I created a double redirect in the article Extended stay hotel to Apartment Hotel. I appreciate you fixing it. Thanks Navou ^talk 20:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TaeBot

Are you still interested in running this bot? —Mets501 (talk) 21:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am. Let us proceed here. —taestell 18:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm nominating "Nerd (disambig)" for deletion

Please note: I am nominating Nerd (disambig) for deletion.
You are shown in the history as having edited this page.
If you wish to object, check the details by clicking the link above.

Regards, JohnI 10:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greatest Hits

Yeah, that occurred to me just after I finished. Sorry for not thinking it through fully beforehand. Feel free to change the appropriate redirects back, or I will get to it myself eventually. Thanks, InnocuousPseudonym 19:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for changing them back. InnocuousPseudonym 21:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Clutch - Transnational Speedway League.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch - Transnational Speedway League.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Clutch - The Elephant Riders.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch - The Elephant Riders.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Clutch - Slow Hole to China.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch - Slow Hole to China.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Clutch - Pure Rock Fury.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch - Pure Rock Fury.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Clutch - Pitchfork.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch - Pitchfork.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Clutch - Passive Restraints.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch - Passive Restraints.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Clutch - Live at the Googolplex.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch - Live at the Googolplex.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Clutch - Jam Room.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch - Jam Room.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Clutch - Impetus.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch - Impetus.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Clutch - Clutch.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch - Clutch.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Clutch - Blast Tyrant.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch - Blast Tyrant.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision3 Corporation

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Revision3 Corporation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Breno ^talk 15:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:ROTSS.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ROTSS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 07:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:MMW.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:MMW.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 16:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Deer Park alpha 1 installation.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Deer Park alpha 1 installation.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Deer Park alpha 1 options.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Deer Park alpha 1 options.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot

Hi, I need help from your bot or from another bot you know, to change Portugese ---> Portuguese and Sporting Lisbon ---> Sporting Portugal. Wikipedia has too many articles with these wrong words/designations, so I can't do the change without the help of an automated bot. Thank you. Miguelzinho 10:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The whigs-big fat lip-cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The whigs-big fat lip-cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Live at the Crystal Palace

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Live at the Crystal Palace, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Live at the Crystal Palace. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 22:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Live at the Crystal Palace

An editor has nominated Live at the Crystal Palace, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live at the Crystal Palace and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision 3 article images

Hi. I noticed you created the Revision 3 article. In case it's of any interest to you and you have any input, there's a discussion going on on it's talk page regarding the images used in the page. Thanks. Ha! (talk) 18:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BitTornado 0.3.7 on Windows XP.png

Thanks for uploading Image:BitTornado 0.3.7 on Windows XP.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Thee Shams

A tag has been placed on Thee Shams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. WilliamRoper (talk) 08:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Deer_Park_alpha_1_options.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Deer_Park_alpha_1_options.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. O sama K 06:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Deer_Park_alpha_1_installation.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Deer_Park_alpha_1_installation.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. O sama K 06:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bearcast

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bearcast, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rtphokie (talk) 10:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Security Now!

I have nominated Security Now!, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Security Now!. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie (talk) 17:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

AfD nomination of Bearcast

I have nominated Bearcast, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bearcast. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie (talk) 13:17, 25 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Bearcast

Are you connected with Bearcast or bearcastradio.com?--Rtphokie (talk) 13:20, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bearcast.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bearcast.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to join WikiProject Ohio

Hi, you are listed under Category:Wikipedians in Ohio or one of its subcategories. WikiProject Ohio has been slowing down and we're looking for active Ohioans to turn that around! But first, let us introduce ourselves; we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ohio and we're sure there's somewhere you'll fit in just fine. The project's departments include article quality assessment: We have over 5,000 articles to assess for class alone, newsletter writing: This has been delayed by a few months, and new page patrolling: Which has also been slowing down. We also have a newly formed taskforce on our over 1,000 townships at WP:OHTWP.

We have 132 members, many of which are not active within the project. If you are listed there and still received this message please accept the auotmated porcess's apologies. If you are interested in joining us please list you name here. If you're not interested please note this is a one time invite and you will never hear from us again.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to leave a message at our talkpage or with any member of the project, we'll be happy to answer any of your questions. We look forward to seeing you around!

Delivered by: §hepBot (Disable) 04:18, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first Wikipedian meetup in Ohio

Are you from the Ohio area? A Wikipedian meetup is taking place on July 18, 2009 in Columbus. If you are interested in coming or would like more information, see the first Ohio meetup page.

Thanks! --Rkitko ^(talk) 23:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Taestell! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Greg Brown (rock musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

allizom

Hi,

You once edited the allizom redirect. What is it for? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deathray

The article Deathray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Allizom listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Allizom. Since you had some involvement with the Allizom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cincinnati Streetcar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Mann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! Great Buckeye Wiknic 2016

Hello there! You are invited to attend the Great Buckeye Wiknic in Columbus, Ohio on Sunday, July 10th from 1:00 to 5:00 PM! Join us for a day in the park for food and socializing with others from the Wikimedia movement. We'll be meeting up at Fred Beekman Park, a park on Ohio State University's campus.

If you're interested, please take a look at our events page for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!

If you have any questions, feel free to leave one on my talk page. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: If you would like to stop receiving notifications regarding Wikimedia events around Ohio, you may remove your username from this list.)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Taestell. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Taestell. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Taestell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Circa Resort & Casino

The article Circa Resort & Casino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not yet notable--not expected to open until Dec. 2020

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emilio Estevez at the 2018 Toronto International Film Festival.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emilio Estevez at the 2018 Toronto International Film Festival.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"List of largest cities in the United States" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of largest cities in the United States. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 26#List of largest cities in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]