Jump to content

Rebutia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rebutia
Rebutia minuscula var. wessneriana
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Order: Caryophyllales
Family: Cactaceae
Subfamily: Cactoideae
Tribe: Cereeae
Subtribe: Rebutiinae
Genus: Rebutia
K.Schum.
Type species
Rebutia minuscula
Synonyms[1]
  • Eurebutia (Backeb.) Vande Weghe

Rebutia is a genus of flowering plants in the family Cactaceae, native to Bolivia and Argentina. The limits of the genus have varied widely, depending on whether genera such as Aylostera and Weingartia are included or treated separately. As of December 2024, Plants of the World Online accepted only three species of Rebutia. A very large number of plants that have been treated in cultivation as species of Rebutia are now generally regarded as varieties, forms or synonyms of a much smaller number of species, or have been transferred to other genera. Plants treated as Rebutia are generally small, colorful cacti, globular in form, which freely produce flowers that are relatively large in relation to the body. They have no distinctive ribs, but do have regularly arranged small tubercles. They are considered fairly easy to grow and they may produce large quantities of seeds that germinate freely around the parent plant.

Taxonomy

[edit]

The genus was designated in 1895 by Karl Moritz Schumann[2] and named after Pierre Rebut (1828–1902), a French cactus nurseryman. The type species is R. minuscula, which has been in cultivation since 1887.[3][4]

Historical limits of the genus

[edit]

There has been considerable debate about the extent of the genus. In the middle of the twentieth century there was a tendency to separate groups of plants within Rebutia as new genera, e.g. Mediolobivia, whereas towards the end of the century the reverse tendency predominated, with genera previously regarded as separate, such as Weingartia, being subsumed within Rebutia. At the beginning of the twenty-first century there was a broad consensus, as reflected in Kew's list of Vascular Plant Families and Genera, that the following genera should be regarded as synonyms of Rebutia:[5]

(The generic names Bridgesia, Spegazzinia, Echinorebutia, Eurebutia, Mediorebutia, Neogymnantha and Setirebutia are invalid, the first two because they are homonyms of Bridgesia Bert. ex Cambess. and Spegazzinia Backeb. respectively,[6] the remainder for lack of any valid publication. Some of these are nevertheless valid names for subdivisions of the genus.[citation needed])

The history of the taxonomic treatment of the genera Rebutia, Aylostera, Weingartia, Sulcorebutia and Cintia is summarized below.[7]

K. Schumann Britton & Rose Spegazzini A. V. Frič
1895 1896 - 1921 1922 1923 1932 - 1938
Rebutia
genus novum
Echinocactus
Echinopsis
Rebutia
renovation
Rebutia
Rebutia
Rebutia Rebutia Aylostera
genus novum
Digitorebutia, Cylindrorebutia,
Echinorebutia, Setirebutia,
Hymenorebutia, Scopaerebutia
C. Backeberg Donald ICSG Anderson Rowley Mosti & Papini[7]
1966 1975 2001 2009 2011
Rebutia K. Schum. Rebutia
sectio Rebutia
Rebutia Rebutia
subg. Rebutia
Rebutia
Aylostera Speg. Rebutia
sectio Aylostera
Rebutia Aylostera
subg. Aylostera
Aylostera
subg. Aylostera
Mediolobivia Backeb. Rebutia
sectio Setirebutia,
Digitorebutia, Cylindrorebutia
Rebutia Aylostera
subg. Mediolobivia
Aylostera
subg. Mediolobivia
Weingartia Werderm.
syn.Spegazzinia Backeb.
Weingartia Rebutia Rebutia
subg. Weingartia
Weingartia
Sulcorebutia Backeb. Sulcorebutia Rebutia Rebutia
subg. Sulcorebutia
Weingartia
incl. Cintia

The variation in the treatment of the genus is illustrated by the difference between Anderson in 2001, who synonymized genera including Aylostera and Weingartia with Rebutia, thereby creating a genus with as many as 41 species, and Mosti et al., who in 2011 separated Aylostera and Weingartia (including Cintia and Sulcorebutia) from Rebutia.[7] As of December 2022, Plants of the World Online agreed with Mosti et al. in keeping Aylostera separate,[8] and also merged Cintia and Sulcorebutia into Weingartia,[9] resulting in Rebutia having only three species.[1]

Phylogeny

[edit]

Molecular phylogenetic studies showed that when broadly circumscribed, the genus Rebutia was polyphyletic. Sulcorebutia and Weingartia were kept as separate genera in a 2007 study whose summary cladogram for those species studied is shown below.[10]

Rebutia I (R. pseudodeminuta, R. fiebrigii, R. deminuta, R. pygmaea, R. steinmannii and R. einsteinii)

Other genera

Browningia hertlingiana

Browningia candelaris

Rebutia II (R. minuscula and R. padcayensis)

Sulcorebutia, Weingartia and Cintia

Species formerly classified as Weingartia, Sulcorebutia and Cintia showed a close relationship to each other and to species of Rebutia with naked pericarpels (Rebutia II above), including the type species R. minuscula. The larger group of species of Rebutia studied, those with hairy or bristly pericarpels, formed a separate, more distantly related clade (Rebutia I). It was suggested that these be excluded from the genus,[10] and as of December 2024, Plants of the World Online placed them in the genus Aylostera.[8]

Species

[edit]

The number of species has been debated, because of disagreement both over what constitutes the genus and what constitutes a species. A very large number of plants that have circulated as species of Rebutia are now generally regarded as varieties, forms or synonyms of others.[11] E. F. Anderson recognised 41 species in 2001.[12] Only the following three species were accepted by Plants of the World Online as of December 2024.[1]

Image Scientific name Distribution
Rebutia fabrisii Rausch Argentina
Rebutia minuscula K.Schum. Argentina
Rebutia padcayensis Rausch Bolivia to Argentina (Salta)
[edit]

Notes and references

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c "Rebutia K.Schum". Plants of the World Online. Retrieved 2024-12-20.
  2. ^ Monatsschrift für Kakteenkunde, 5: 102, 1895
  3. ^ N. L. Britton, J. N. Rose, The Cactaceae, Washington, 1920, vol.III, p.45.
  4. ^ Archives départementales du Rhône. death record. Chazay-d'Azergues. 14 March 1902.
  5. ^ "List of genera in family Cactaceae", Vascular Plant Families and Genera, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, retrieved 2013-03-10
  6. ^ "Spegazzinia Backeb". www.gbif.org. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
  7. ^ a b c Mosti, Stefano; Bandara, Nadeesha Lewke & Papini, Alessio (2011), "Further insights and new combinations in Aylostera (Cactaceae) based on molecular and morphological data", Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43 (6): 2769–2785, retrieved 2013-03-19
  8. ^ a b "Aylostera Speg." Plants of the World Online. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Retrieved 2024-12-20.
  9. ^ "Weingartia Werderm." Plants of the World Online. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Retrieved 2024-12-20.
  10. ^ a b Ritz, Christiane M.; Martins, Ludwig; Mecklenburg, Rainer; Goremykin, Vadim & Hellwig, Frank H. (2007), "The molecular phylogeny of Rebutia (Cactaceae) and its allies demonstrates the influence of paleogeography on the evolution of South American mountain cacti", American Journal of Botany, 94 (8): 1321–1332, doi:10.3732/ajb.94.8.1321, PMID 21636499. Summary cladogram based on Fig. 2.
  11. ^ Cf. the list of approximately two hundred names under Rebutia (not to mention those given under other genera) provided in B. Fearn and L. Pearcy, The Genus Rebutia, 1895-1981, Matlock: Abbey Brook, 1981, pp.60-71.
  12. ^ Edward F. Anderson, The Cactus Family, Portland, Oregon: Timber Press, 2001, pp.599-611.
[edit]