User talk:EdH

Welcome

Hello there EdH, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. MB 15:43 16 May 2003 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

When creating an article, could you take care to highlight the title phrase or title word very early in the article (typically on the first line)? (See how I edited your Coulson article.) Michael Hardy 21:42 16 May 2003 (UTC)

Lawrence Brockett

Hi. Please see Talk:Lawrence Brockett. Mintguy 10:33 23 May 2003 (UTC)

Empire

Hey, thanks for the Empire link! Ark30inf

Jan Lukasiewicz

Hi EdH, I see that you have done a lot on Jan Lukasiewicz. You seem to know more than I, but I am concerned that we have a spelling conflict over one of the names in the Warsaw School. (See the "studied with" sentence near head of Alfred Tarski. My Source (I can look it up and provide if you like) has Le&#347niewski. How confident are you in your spelling? Thanks, vanden 07:07, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hi EdH, got your message, saw the update, and I don't mind in the least that you put the exchange onto the talk page. A pleasure working with you! vanden 08:46, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Philosophy of perception

Your work on Philosophy of perception is excellent – thank you. Banno 12:44, 5 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Louis Kahn

Louis Kahn: please check that I didn't eliminate anything trying to fix our edit conflict just now. Thanks. Wetman 07:15, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Dick Clarke

You broke the path from Dick Clarke (and thus from Dick Clark) to Richard Clarke), replacing it with a closed loop. If your intentions were good, please forgive my writing in an insistent tone. In any case, please explain those intentions for the record, in a reply here on your own talk page.
--Jerz y (t) 22:13, 2004 Jun 24 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Dick Clarke EdH 20:07, Jun 26, 2004 (UTC).

Thanks, Ed, now that you describe it, i can see how i could have done that myself, and have confidently failed to check my work. BTW, i admire

your clear exposition of the situation (it's under GFDL, so there's no point agonizing about whether it's an idea or the expression of an idea, so i will steal it someday without hesitation!) and
your clean and effective structure for solving the underlying problem, which is substantially better than what i could come up with.

--Jerzy (t) 02:14, 2004 Jun 27 (UTC)

Haileybury

I notice that you have done most of the work on the article about my alma mater Haileybury. What's your connection with the old place? Or are you just interested? --Phil | Talk 12:56, Jun 25, 2004 (UTC)

excellent edit in puberty

I didn't go back to see if the tautology was my own sparkling prose because I would be severely embarrassed if it were. Seriously. Alteripse 19:24, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)

GB/UK

Ed, why are you changing all of the UK links to GB? GB is just an island and has been irrelevant for centuries, UK is the country. The links should be changed the other way. --Steinsky 12:56, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

You might want to look at user talk:Bobblewik and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Bobblewik Mintguy (T)

Those darn lights

Ed, see Talk:Marfa light. Moriori 01:27, Aug 14, 2004 (UTC)

Please note I have no interest in this subject, for which information was supplied by user edh and not user EdH. EdH 14:06, Aug 20, 2004 (UTC)

Apologies EdH. It was confusing having a Edh as well. Moriori 20:35, Aug 20, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. – Ram-Man ^{(comment) (talk)}[[]] 14:44, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. It doesn't look like you're tremendously active anymore, but if you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 23:01, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 05:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Pope

Are you sure he is an Old Haileyburian? Cjc13 (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you have not responded to this request for additional information. Was it unreasonable? I, too, would welcome some clarification as to whether or not Philip Pope can properly be described as an 'Old Haileyburian'. On what grounds have you included him in that category? What I am aware of is that between, and including, the years 1971 and 1974 (I could be inaccurate here by one year in either direction) he was a pupil at another school.(CtznofRvna (talk) 14:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Not unreasonable, I don't log in here very often these days. Possibly there is a name confusion here; in case there are two Philip Popes I have removed the categorization. EdH (talk) 17:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for providing a reply. It is much appreciated. Thank you also for removing the categorisation on the page for P. Pope. It is my intention to add information concerning his education, but I have preferred to refrain from doing so until this discussion has been resolved.

It is my understanding from the information that you have posted that there is another person, also called Philip Pope, who may be called correctly an 'Old Haileyburian'. This is worth recording because it could well be that such a misunderstanding may occur again, particularly if someone should create a Wikipedia page for that other person.

There is also another possibiliy. Following the posting which I made above I went to the web-site of Haileybury College. It informed me that the College has the equivalent of a preparatory school (possiby more than one - it has some connection with a school at another location). I was not previously aware of this. Could it be that Philip Pope ('the musician', the subject of the Wikipedia page with which we are concerned) was a pupil at one of these two schools before going on to his 'secondary' school? CtznofRvna (talk) 01:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Philip Pope for any further discussion/speculation on this topic. EdH (talk) 16:13, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Tip Sheet

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Tip Sheet, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

tagged for no references since November 2006

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Teapotgeorge^Talk 14:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmadinejad

I see you have improved Ahmadinejad's article quite a lot. Thanks for your work. However I think the leading paragraph has to be more focused on his policies as Iran's president, before anything else. Please see the leading page of other world leaders. The first paragraph has to include all major decisions he made and his main impact on Iran. Sina Kardar (talk) 18:24, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely. There is too much muddled controversy at the moment. I have been trying to reformat without altering the content significantly. I removed nothing from that part of the article except a small piece of text about the current temporary problem with the cabinet which is relocated in the appropriate section below.

I don't think the first paragraph can include all major decisions, but only the most important. I will pose this question in the Talk:Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad page. Which are the most important things that absolutely have to be in the first section above the table of contents? I would appreciate any help you might offer in making a list of what should be there.EdH (talk) 18:39, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monier Monier-Williams

You were the original author of his page. Do you have your sources? Alatari (talk) 09:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I copy below my response.

I don't specifically recollect the sources I used at the time of writing in 2004, which was before the emphasis on references in Wikipedia developed. At that time I added references in the External links section, so you may wish to explore those links.

The Encyclopedia Britannica 1911 article has been copied into the article's talk page, and Google Books has now scanned an obituary that should serve to confirm anything you need. Please see The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland for 1899 pages 730ff. EdH (talk) 23:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Malvern College

Hi EdH! Malvern College, an article you have edited or contributed to, concerns an important school. It still needs some urgent attention. If you can help, please see Talk:Malvern College#Lead Section regarding how it may be improved. (This is a generic message, if it has been placed on your talk page inadvertantly, please ignore it.)'--Kudpung (talk)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello EdH! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Clive Martin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Elisha Collier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My comment:

Elisha Collier invented a revolver 200 years ago. Probably not still living. The article on Clive Martin has been very adequately referenced by others.EdH (talk) 17:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, EdH. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, EdH. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, EdH. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, EdH. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Polydivisible number for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polydivisible number is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polydivisible number until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Prova-nome (talk) 03:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Malvern College

Malvern College has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]