Jump to content

Talk:Leicester

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateLeicester is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 13, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted

Semper eadem

[edit]

The coat of arms image has SEMPER AEDEM underneath it, which is incorrect - it’s SEMPER EADEM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.158.159 (talk) 18:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 April 2023

[edit]

I want to change information, create a few articles and make articles stronger Geogaryc (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Cannolis (talk) 16:26, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Record high temperature

[edit]

I've been told by a local resident that Leicester saw new record high temperatures only a couple of years ago. A quick Googling shows a news article from July of 2022 with record highs cited which exceed those that are within the Wiki article.

https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/leicester-news/tinderbox-leicestershire-scary-record-temperatures-7354286 Curzyk (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coronavirus

[edit]

Is section 2.5.3 on coronavirus needed? Except for the two named suburbs a similar paragraph could be included on almost all other UK towns and cities. I propose its removal. Any objections? Rupples (talk) 00:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully agree. 10mmsocket (talk) 05:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. The lockdowns were worse in Leicester for longer than most other places. However the paragraph can be altered as the lockdowns were 3 to four years ago now..— Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinney Hill (talkcontribs) 14:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It would be helpful if a narrative with reliable source could be included to support your claim "the lockdowns were worse in Leicester . . ." as that may be sufficient to justify keeping a paragraph on Covid. What's written at present is largely generic. Rupples (talk) 17:35, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The paragraph could read "The COVID-19 pandemic brought many social and economic challenges across the country and across the world. Leicester was particularly badly affected in the United Kingdom. From July 2020 the first local lockdown in the country was put in place and all non-essential retail establishments closed again and businesses such as public houses, restaurants and hairdressers were unable to reopen. Citizens of Leicester spent more time subject to restrictions than elsewhere in the country. A report was published in August 2023 and the city’s Director for Public Health said that the effect of the restrictions was only just beginning to be understood. It was hoped that lessons had been and would be learnt and he hoped that the health of the city would be improved during any future pandemic and generally. A hundred extra days had been spent in lockdown and 1171 lives lost by 5th December 2022. In the year following Junes 2020 Leicester suffered more cases and a slower recovery than the rest of the UK".
The following sources may be useful, particularly the first two:
https://www.leicester.gov.uk/content/beyond-the-lockdowns-lessons-learned-from-leicester-s-covid-story/healthy-places/  ; https://www.publicsectorexecutive.com/articles/covid-report-outlines-effects-lockdown-leicester ; https://www.itv.com/news/central/2021-02-23/leicester-the-city-thats-suffered-the-longest ;https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-53229371 ; https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-54423723 Spinney Hill (talk) 00:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Based on the sources you've highlighted, I now believe a rewritten section is preferable to removal. I'd favour restricting the narrative specifically to Leicester, so for example, removing "across the country and across the world" from the opening sentence, as well as general information about lockdown restrictions - these can be Wikilinked to suitable articles. Nor would I include "It was hoped that lessons had been and would be learnt ... any future pandemic and generally" - comes across as 'well he would say that, wouldn't he?' The rest looks on the right track. The PSE source looks promising. Rupples (talk) 01:37, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Further source: https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/local-lockdowns-the-legislative-framework-in-england/ Rupples (talk) 01:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/feb/17/why-leicester-blackburn-and-bradford-have-been-hit-hard-by-covid Rupples (talk) 02:02, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]